Government & Public Sector

Government Software Development

Accessible, secure digital services for public agencies — delivered as a subcontractor or through the procurement route your agency uses.

.NET.NETJavaJavaReactReactPostgreSQLPostgreSQLMicrosoft AzureMicrosoft AzureAWSAWS

Challenges in government software

  • Paper and PDF forms that residents must print, sign and mail
  • Case files spread across email, spreadsheets and legacy systems
  • Websites and services that fail accessibility requirements
  • Ageing systems that only a few staff know how to maintain
  • Strict security, procurement and records-retention rules

Software we build for government

Citizen portals

Online applications, payments, status tracking and notifications.

Case management

Intake, assignment, deadlines, documents and audit trails.

Permitting & licensing

Applications, reviews, inspections and renewals in one workflow.

Forms digitisation

Accessible online forms that replace paper and PDF processes.

Data & reporting

Dashboards for performance, open data and statutory reporting.

Legacy modernisation

Incremental replacement of ageing systems without service interruption.

Compliance and security

Requirement What it means for your software
Section 508 Federal ICT accessibility requirements, met by designing and testing to WCAG 2.x AA
FISMA / NIST SP 800-53 Security controls for federal information systems; we implement controls defined in the agency’s security plan
FedRAMP / StateRAMP Authorisation programmes for cloud services; we deploy to authorised cloud environments chosen by the agency
CJIS Security Policy Applies when systems handle criminal justice information — only relevant to those projects
Records retention Retention and disposition schedules set by the agency and applicable public-records law

We build the technical controls these rules require and work with your compliance and legal advisers, who confirm obligations.

Systems we integrate with

IdentityLogin.gov, Azure AD / Entra ID and agency SSO
PaymentsGovernment payment processors and card providers
DocumentsSharePoint, document management and e-signature tools
DataExisting agency databases, GIS and reporting platforms

How we work with public agencies

Public-sector work is bought through formal procurement. We do not claim government contract vehicles or certifications we do not hold. Instead we work in the ways agencies and their primes commonly use: as a subcontractor to a prime contractor, through the small-purchase or cooperative procurement routes an agency already uses, or directly for local bodies whose rules allow it.

We work inside the agency’s environment and policies — its approved cloud, identity provider, change-management process and security plan — and provide the documentation that security and accessibility reviews require.

Accessible and usable by everyone

  • Plain-language content and forms that ask only what is needed
  • Keyboard and screen-reader testing alongside automated checks
  • Mobile-first design — many residents use only a phone
  • Save-and-return for long applications
  • Multilingual support where the community needs it

Accessibility is tested throughout development, not audited at the end. See accessibility testing.

Modernising a legacy system in stages

Many agencies depend on systems built decades ago in technologies few people still maintain. Replacing them in one go is risky: requirements are often embedded in code nobody fully understands, and a failed cut-over can stop a public service. A staged approach is safer.

  1. Discover

    Document what the current system really does, including the rules hidden in its code and the reports staff rely on.

  2. Wrap

    Put an API layer around the old system so new services can read and write data without changing it.

  3. Replace by function

    Move one function at a time — for example online applications, then case assignment, then reporting — to the new platform.

  4. Retire

    Migrate remaining data under the agency’s retention rules and switch off the old system once nothing depends on it.

Throughout, staff and residents keep a working service, and each stage delivers something useful on its own.

Security and documentation reviews

Agency security reviews expect clear evidence. We provide system architecture and data-flow diagrams, a description of how each relevant control in the agency’s security plan is implemented, dependency and vulnerability scan results, accessibility conformance reports and runbooks for operations and incident response. Code lives in repositories the agency can access, and we hand over everything needed for another team to maintain the system — avoiding the vendor lock-in that has made many public systems hard to change.

Where an independent assessment is required, we support the assessor rather than certifying our own work.

A reference architecture for public-sector digital services

Government services usually span a public-facing front end, case-management or line-of-business systems, document storage and identity. A modern architecture keeps the public front end lightweight and accessible, routes everything through documented APIs, and leaves records in the agency’s systems of record.

Layer What it does Notes
Public front end Forms, status tracking, payments, notices Plain language, WCAG 2.2 AA / Section 508, works on low-end phones
Identity Resident and staff sign-in Agency-approved identity provider; Login.gov where the agency uses it
Service APIs Submission, validation, status and notifications Versioned, documented, with audit logging
Case management Staff review, decisions, assignments Often an existing platform extended rather than replaced
Records & documents Retention, disclosure and archiving Follows the agency’s records schedule
Hosting Cloud or on-premises environment An environment with the authorisations the agency requires (e.g. FedRAMP or StateRAMP)

The agency, its prime contractor or its authorising official decides on hosting and security authorisation; we build to fit those decisions. See legacy modernization and web portals.

Walkthrough: replacing a paper or PDF application

  1. Discovery with staff and residents2–3 weeks

    Observe how applications arrive and are processed today; interview applicants, including people who use assistive technology.

  2. Rewrite the form in plain language1–2 weeks

    Remove questions the agency already knows or does not need; split the rest into short, logical steps.

  3. Prototype and usability test2–3 weeks

    Test clickable prototypes with real applicants and screen-reader users, then refine.

  4. Build, integrate and document6–12 weeks

    Develop the service, connect it to case management, and produce the security and accessibility documentation reviewers need.

  5. Run in parallel, then switch4–8 weeks

    Keep the old route available while the digital service proves itself, then retire it.

Timelines are typical; procurement, security review and authorisation steps vary widely between agencies.

Build or buy for government systems

Need Usually buy or reuse Where custom work fits
Case management Configurable case management or low-code platforms Integrations, public front ends and data migration
Payments The agency’s approved payment processor Embedding payments cleanly into service journeys
Content websites Established CMS platforms Accessible templates and structured content models
Forms Form builders for simple, low-volume forms Complex eligibility logic and multi-step services
Analytics Approved analytics tools Dashboards that join service and operational data

Common mistakes and questions to settle first

  • Digitising a confusing paper form exactly as it is
  • Testing accessibility only with automated tools at the end
  • Big-bang replacement of a legacy system with no parallel running
  • Unclear ownership of content and rules after launch
  • Collecting more personal data than the service requires

Useful questions before work begins: Which procurement route and prime contractor, if any, will the work run through? Which hosting environment and security authorisation apply? Who approves accessibility conformance? What records retention rules cover the data? Which staff teams will run the service day to day?

Measuring whether a public service works

Public services are judged by outcomes for residents, not by launch dates. Before building, we agree a small set of measures with the agency and design the service to record them from day one, without collecting unnecessary personal data.

Measure What it shows
Completion rate Share of people who start the service and finish it
Time to decision How long applicants wait for an outcome
Contact rate How often people call or email because the service was unclear
Digital take-up Share of applications arriving through the digital route
Accessibility issues reported Barriers found by users after launch
Error and rework rate Applications returned for missing or incorrect information

These measures support budget conversations and continuous improvement. They also help identify residents the digital route is not serving well, so assisted channels can be kept and improved rather than withdrawn.

Open standards and avoiding lock-in

Agencies often inherit systems that are hard to change because the data and code are controlled by a single vendor. We favour open standards, documented APIs, exportable data and code the agency owns or can access under its contract terms. Documentation, runbooks and knowledge transfer are delivered as part of the work, so another team — internal or external — can maintain the system later.

Measures agencies use to judge a digital service

Measure Why it matters
Completion rate Whether people can finish the task online without help
Cost per transaction Savings compared with paper, phone or in-person channels
Time to decision How long applicants wait for an outcome
Accessibility conformance Section 508 and WCAG compliance across releases
User satisfaction Short surveys at the end of the service

Illustrative metrics; which ones matter depends on your organisation and goals.

We help agencies define and instrument these measures. Decisions about hosting, authorisation to operate and procurement stay with the agency and its prime contractor where one is involved; we do not claim contract vehicles or certifications we do not hold.

Government technology glossary

Term Meaning
ATO Authorisation to operate, granted by the agency for a system
Section 508 US federal accessibility requirements for ICT
Prime contractor The firm holding the contract with the agency, often with subcontractors
Records schedule Rules on how long records are kept and how they are disposed of

Clear definitions help vendors, programme staff and IT reviewers work from the same assumptions.

Services for this industry

Related: legacy modernization, web portals, document management and cybersecurity engineering.

FAQ

Government FAQ

Still have questions? Talk to a solutions architect — free, no obligation.

Do you hold government contract vehicles?
No. We work as a subcontractor or through procurement routes the agency already uses, and say so plainly.
Can you meet Section 508 requirements?
Yes. We design and test to WCAG 2.x AA, the standard Section 508 references, and document conformance.
Can you host in a FedRAMP-authorised cloud?
We deploy to authorised environments such as AWS GovCloud or Azure Government when the agency provides or approves them.
Can you modernise a legacy system without downtime?
Usually yes, by replacing it in stages while the old system keeps running.

Let’s talk about your government project

Free 30-minute consultation and a written estimate within 48 hours.

Call WhatsApp Get a Quote