WhatsApp
Vue.js
TypeScript
Laravel
Node.js
Tailwind CSSWhy Vue.js
Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework known for its gentle learning curve, clear single-file components and excellent performance. Vue 3’s Composition API and TypeScript support make it suitable for large applications, while Nuxt adds server rendering and routing similar to Next.js.
Vue pairs particularly well with Laravel through Inertia.js, making it a popular choice for PHP teams building modern, reactive interfaces.
When Vue.js is the right choice
| Details | |
|---|---|
| Great fit | Laravel applications, dashboards, teams who value simplicity, Nuxt-powered content sites |
| Consider alternatives | Projects needing the widest third-party ecosystem, where React may offer more options |
What we build with Vue.js
Web apps & dashboards
Reactive interfaces with Pinia state and TypeScript.
Laravel + Inertia apps
Single-page experience without building a separate API.
Nuxt websites
SEO-friendly sites with server rendering.
Vue 2 → Vue 3 migration
Upgrades for applications on the end-of-life Vue 2.
Our Vue.js toolkit
Upgrading from Vue 2
Vue 2 reached end of life at the end of 2023 and no longer receives updates. Upgrading to Vue 3 involves changes to the global API, some component patterns and many third-party libraries. We assess dependencies first, use the Vue migration build to run Vue 2 code on Vue 3 temporarily, and convert components step by step with tests.
Vue, Nuxt or another framework?
Vue on its own is ideal for single-page applications and for adding interactivity to server-rendered pages, for example inside a Laravel or Django application. Nuxt builds on Vue the way Next.js builds on React, adding file-based routing, server-side rendering, static generation and server routes — the right choice for SEO-sensitive sites, content platforms and e-commerce storefronts. When an organisation already has a large React codebase or hiring pipeline, we usually recommend staying with React; Vue is strongest where teams value its gentle learning curve and readable single-file components.
Migrating from Vue 2 to Vue 3
Vue 2 reached end of life at the end of 2023 and no longer receives security fixes. Migration is usually manageable but needs planning, because popular Vue 2 plugins and UI libraries changed or were replaced.
- Audit dependencies and find Vue 3 equivalents (for example Vuex to Pinia, Vue CLI to Vite).
- Use the migration build, which runs Vue 2 code on Vue 3 and logs deprecated usage.
- Fix warnings area by area, then remove the compatibility layer.
- Adopt the Composition API gradually; the Options API remains fully supported in Vue 3.
Patterns for maintainable Vue applications
We keep components small and focused, move shared logic into composables rather than mixins, and use Pinia stores only for genuinely shared state. TypeScript support in Vue 3 is strong, so we type props, emits and stores from the start. Component tests with Vitest and Vue Test Utils, plus end-to-end tests with Playwright, give teams confidence to refactor as the product grows.
Vue in existing applications
One of Vue’s practical strengths is how easily it can be introduced into an existing server-rendered application. A Laravel, Django, Rails or legacy PHP site can mount Vue components on individual pages — a complex form, a filterable table, an interactive configurator — without converting the whole site into a single-page application. Tools such as Inertia.js go further, letting Laravel or Rails controllers render Vue pages directly with no separate API to maintain. For teams modernising gradually, this keeps risk and cost low while users get a noticeably better experience where it matters most.
The Vue ecosystem in practice
Vue’s official libraries — router, state management, build tooling and devtools — are maintained by the core team, which keeps the ecosystem coherent and upgrades predictable.
Options API or Composition API?
| Options API | Composition API | |
|---|---|---|
| Style | Code grouped by option type (data, methods, computed) | Code grouped by feature or concern |
| Reuse | Mixins — implicit and prone to clashes | Composables — explicit and type-friendly |
| TypeScript | Workable | Excellent |
| Best for | Small components and existing Vue 2 code | New Vue 3 projects and larger applications |
Both are supported in Vue 3. We write new code with the Composition API and leave stable Options API components alone unless they are being changed for another reason.
Vue with Laravel
Vue is especially popular with Laravel teams. We use Inertia.js when a team wants server-side routing and controllers with Vue pages and no separate API, and a decoupled Vue or Nuxt front end with a Laravel API when the same back end must also serve mobile apps or partners. Inertia keeps small teams very productive; a decoupled API offers more flexibility at the cost of more moving parts. See Laravel development.
A typical Vue engagement
-
Assessment or setup1–2 weeks
Review an existing Vue 2 or Vue 3 codebase, or establish the stack and conventions for a new build.
-
Component library2–3 weeks
Accessible base components and layout patterns documented for the team.
-
Feature deliveryOngoing
Sprints with demos, code review and automated tests.
-
Performance and SEO1 week
Lazy loading, bundle analysis and, with Nuxt, metadata and rendering per route.
Vue project health checklist
- Running a supported Vue 3 version (Vue 2 reached end of life at the end of 2023)
- Pinia instead of Vuex for new state
- TypeScript with vue-tsc type checking in CI
- Composables instead of mixins for shared logic
- Lazy-loaded routes and components for large screens
- Component and end-to-end tests for critical flows
- No reliance on unmaintained Vue 2-era plugins
Nuxt for SEO-sensitive Vue sites
A client-rendered Vue app sends search engines an almost empty page that must be rendered with JavaScript. For marketing sites, stores and content platforms, Nuxt renders pages on the server or at build time, so complete HTML, metadata and structured data are available immediately. Nuxt also supports hybrid rendering — static for marketing pages, server-rendered for search results, client-only for dashboards — configured per route.
Measuring a Vue project’s success
- Page load and interaction performance measured from real users
- Bundle size per route, tracked over time
- Error rates after each release
- Time taken to add a typical feature, as a proxy for maintainability
- Upgrade effort — staying on supported Vue and Nuxt versions without large rewrites
Need Vue engineers on your team? See hire Vue developers.
When to choose Vue over React or Angular
Vue suits teams that want an approachable framework with official solutions for routing and state, progressive adoption inside existing server-rendered pages, and a gentle learning curve for developers coming from HTML, CSS and jQuery. It is especially common in Laravel and PHP shops. React offers a larger ecosystem and hiring pool; Angular offers more enforced structure. We help you weigh these against your team and product, not fashion.
Whichever framework you choose, we document the decision so future team members understand why it was made.
Work with us
Part of our frontend technologies. Pairs with Laravel. Need Vue engineers? See hire Vue developers.
This page is part of Frontend Development Services — see the full overview for related services, approach and pricing.